I have never laughed and cried so hard or so much as I did yesterday during A Boy and His Soul at the Vineyard Theatre. This one-man show, written by and starring Colman Domingo has a limited run (September-October) but if yesterday’s audience was any barometer, it will be extended and/or moved. Directed by Tony Kelly and Choreographed by Ken Roberson, A Boy and His Soul is an exquisite composite of music, dance, memoir and more music. Set in a pitch perfect suburban basement/rec room (Scenic Design by Rachel Hauck) Mr. Domingo tells the tale of his childhood and adolescence through a raucous and moving mosaic of soul music. He sings (not enough for this viewer,) dances and is hysterically funny and heartbreaking through 90 minutes of non-stop fabulousness. Mr. Domingo was most recently seen in The Wiz (at City Center) but might be more known for his roles in Passing Strange. He is an extraordinary bundle of talent and has a face that would make Norma Desmond proud. While I usually tread lightly into the terrain of memoir, or as I like to put it; “If it’s about me, it must be fascinating!” there is nothing here that even hints of a vanity project. The script is so shockingly good, I actually found myself wondering if I could purchase it. There were far too many perfect gems in the dialogue to recall, and I wanted to remember it all. If there is a weakness in the script, it is only the way in which the dramatic arc peaks too close to the end and is not in fact the end. A minor point in such an incredible experience. While Mr. Domingo deserves heaps of praise for his script and his performance, clearly this was an ensemble piece. The direction, sound, lights, set, and choreography were all so perfect. I guarantee that this will please you. When the lights came up, I was jubilant and utterly exhausted after loosing so many tears. I have never been so happy to walk outside looking like Tammy Fay.
Tag Archives: Broadway
Othello: Public Theatre – Review
Watching the Public Theatre’s production of Othello reminded me of seeing a large art installation in a Chelsea gallery. As I’ve walked round and round various modern configurations that scream an inaudible MESSAGE, I often find myself admiring the artist’s complete and utter self absorption. “Audience be damned” screams the installation, or in this case Peter Sellars, in his direction of Othello. This Othello at the uncomfortable and antiseptic NYU Skirball Center is more of a derivative of Shakespeare’s play, than the play itself. It is recognizable as Othello, but unlike a riveting deconstructionist production, it adds nothing, only takes away from the original. The enormous auditorium stage is stripped completely, exposing the garage door used for load-in, fuse boxes and flies. The entire set consists of chairs (sometimes used for “off-stage” actors, and sometimes not,) two standing microphones and 45 video monitors that seem to serve no purpose whatsoever. Although in case you missed Mr. Sellars’ point, they too are deconstructed. The conceit of the bare stage can work, but it doesn’t here. The space is large and the performances are not. Let us start with the very first word uttered on stage. My spine stiffened and I quickly scanned the audience for signs of communal disbelief. Shakespeare miked? Philip Seymour Hoffman miked? No, no this can’t be. It must be a device, wait and its intent will unfold. There was no intent. It is a large space and for reasons that will remain a puzzlement to us all, Mr. Sellars miked his actors. There is simply no possible way to enjoy the language and live delivery of Shakespeare via a microphone. After that first line, I decided that this was not to be seen as theatre, but as an art installation. As such, this production is not uninteresting, if for no other reason than for seeing the pageantry of unharnessed narcissism. The casting was of particular interest. I am exaggerating, but it seemed that Othello was the only non-African American actor on that stage. I’m all for adventures in color blind casting, but this just does not work. What’s next? An all white Color Purple? Surrounding Othello with people of color, and casting him with a Latino actor, is a great conceit for good dinner party conversation, and should not go beyond that. John Ortiz is Othello, and handles it as well as Mr. Sellars allows. (Sellars’ heavy hand print is on every performance.) Philip Seymour Hoffman as Iago is bipolar and has body issues. Mr. Hoffman spends half of his stage time being placid and the other half; enraged. He is continuously pulling on his sweater, that does fit rather snuggly over his belly (stress eating during nightmarish rehearsals, no doubt.) Mr. Hoffman is a phenomenal talent, we all know that, but none of it was evident here. During his low moments he was clearly recognizable as himself versus Iago. and enraged, he just seemed silly. Where exactly was the rage coming from? The only standout, who seemed to transcend Mr. Sellars’ “no do it like this” direction was Desdemona, (Jessica Chastain.) While she was put through the same absurd paces as her fellow actors, her clear true voice rang out.
The paces that the actors endured included confrontations by cell phone and blackberry, meshing of multiple characters into one, gender switches, a rape scene substituting for a duel, and zero affection between any of the characters. Othello and Desdemonda spent a great deal of time on the video consoles simulating what can only be called “sleep hugging,” giving no indication of any passion but merely conveying exhaustion (perhaps another remnant of the stressful rehearsal period?) There was absolutely nothing between Iago and Othello, which left so many actions baffling and void of any drama. There was no raucous tavern scene, merely a couple of guys drinking beer and no action to speak of, short of the rape (which was horrifying on several levels.)
Adding to the art installation phenomenon was the lighting of this production. Welcome to Othello: The Light Show. The lighting cues were so prominent and misguided that I became convinced they were done by a recent “lighting major” graduate. “Look what I learned!” But alas, I was so wrong. The lighting is by James F Ingalls, a veteran designer. Bizarre video monitors showing basically nothing aside, the constant; full lights, square spots, full lights, filtered lights, staccato was just unnerving. What in the world was the point? I suspect that the point was personal. Audience be damned! If the audience be damned,.than it really isn’t theatre. This production at best would make for an interesting lesson for acting students (taught by a self absorbed autocrat) but at its worst it is a personal indulgence and should be treated as such. As a rule many private behaviors should be done behind closed doors.
Ruined – Review
This weekend I went, somewhat begrudgingly, to see Ruined at The Manhattan Theatre Club. I knew nothing about the play except that it had just won the Pulitzer Prize for Lynn Nottage. That was enough to get me in the door. Once in the theatre (at City Center) I saw the gigantic wall poster of the play’s synopsis. Out of the corner of my eye I spotted those key cringe inducing Eve Ensler nouns and shuddered. I felt lightheaded at the very thought of two and a half hours of “women as victims” narrative. Well, in for a penny in for a pound as they say. I had my ticket and a pocketful of gourmet jelly beans, so into the theatre with me. My equilibrium began to return the moment I stepped inside. The stage is enormous and the house is small; and excellent combination. The stage was set dramatically and expansively, every inch was performance space. I took my comfortable sixth row seat and spun my head like an owl. The house was filled with actual theatergoers. The interracial crowd was tourist-free; another good sign, nary an M&Ms shopping bag in sight. Sitting in the row directly in front of me was Philip Seymour Hoffman (or Phil as his friends call him) and Laila Robbins (not together;) another very good sign. A few rows ahead of me, Lynn Whitfield sat down. Things were looking up. The last time I had been at a performance with such a healthy percentage of actor to commoner ration was August Osage County.
Never underestimate the veracity of good omens. This play is enormous. Yes, it is a play set in a war torn far off locale, and yes there are unspeakable horrors brought upon women, men and children. But there is nothing treacly or sentimental or preachy about Ruined. It is a beautiful story about the human spirit, that brought me to tears (twice) not out of pity for the characters, but out of admiration for their strength. There are wonderful moments of laughter, and there is music, gorgeous, poetic music. The play is set in a taverna/brothel, and the music is live and an integral part of the play. Kate Whoriskey directs this play at a perfect pace. There is never one moment of downtime or distraction, I was riveted to every moment and motion on stage The play is mostly led by female characters who were beautifully developed. The male lead; Russel G. Jones, broke my heart. He is Herbie to Saidah Arrika Ekulona’s aptly named Mama. It does not belittle Ruined to draw this Gypsy comparison. Both Mama’s live off the “talents” of their girls and both have a traveling salesman wooing them. Mr Jones’ Christian, like Herbie, is driven by decency, and in Ruined this male character trait is most spectacular. Ms. Ekulona is a dynamic actress and finds every nuance of Mama, I could not get enough of her. Condola Rashad (yes, Mrs. Huxtable’s daughter) was a delightful surprise. She does a very fine job in the difficult and demanding role of Sophie. It is when she sings that she really comes to life. A capable singer, she is heartbreaking singing the songs of Lynn Nottage. Enough can not said about the play itself. My only concern about it is that now that it has won the Pulitzer, community theatres across America will tackle it. Human Rights organization will build fundraisers around it. But without the gorgeous direction of Ms. Whoriskey, the play could be cheapened. Produced on the expansive stage of the MTC and staged in such a realistic manner, there is a degree of intimacy that is a key component to the experience. This play should not be “watched” it should be experienced. In the wrong hands it quite possibly could deteriorate into a Congo Monologue. Please see it now while it is as it should be. The play and the performances will stay with you and you’ll feel better for having seen it.




